Connect client requirements and room lists to the corresponding area-schedule rows. Identify omissions, mismatched allowances, and unresolved assumptions before the figures guide further planning.

The actual workflow — connected nodes you can run to preview each step.
Professional capabilities powered by AI.

Find missing or inconsistent entries before schedule figures become the basis for layout development.

Show which brief items are represented, which have changed, and which still require a decision.

Give architects, clients, and project managers a focused list of discrepancies instead of reviewing rows without context.
A difference from the brief is not automatically an error. Confirm whether it reflects a later decision, a different measurement convention, shared space, circulation allowance, or an unresolved change.
Use consistent names and identifiers when matching requirements to rows. Similar room labels can conceal duplicates, while one schedule entry may represent several spaces described separately in the brief.
Keep confirmed figures distinct from assumptions and provisional allowances. The validation is most useful when another reviewer can see why each discrepancy was accepted, questioned, or returned for correction.
Connect requirements to schedule rows and leave the team with a traceable list of matches, variances, and open questions.