Review plan variants A and B against the same program brief and adjacency rules. See where each layout supports room requirements, circulation, and functional relationships before selecting a direction.

The actual workflow — connected nodes you can run to preview each step.
Professional capabilities powered by AI.

Use consistent criteria to narrow two early planning directions before investing in further development.

Give the team a structured account of program fit, adjacency, circulation, and unresolved concerns.

Show clients or stakeholders why one option is preferred without presenting the choice as purely visual.
Begin with requirements that can be applied to both alternatives: required rooms, target relationships, entries, shared spaces, and major circulation routes. Changing the criteria between options weakens the comparison.
Separate critical failures from design preferences. A missing required space or blocked primary route carries a different consequence from a room shape or arrangement that could be refined later.
A preferred variant can still contain important risks. Record the tradeoffs, assumptions, and information needed for the next review instead of reducing the outcome to a single score.
Turn two layouts and one program brief into a clearer record of strengths, tradeoffs, and next decisions.