Use a building photo, white model, or elevation to explore different facade directions. Compare styles, material palettes, and lighting conditions before choosing an option to develop further.

The actual workflow — connected nodes you can run to preview each step.
Professional capabilities powered by AI.

Compare distinct facade approaches before committing time to one architectural language.

Explore how different finishes, glazing treatments, colors, and material combinations could change the appearance of the same building.

Present clearly differentiated alternatives so stakeholders can discuss preferences and narrow the design direction.
First, consider how each option relates to the building’s massing, proportions, openings, and entrance hierarchy. A visually striking treatment may still be unsuitable if it obscures the organization of the original design.
Compare material hierarchy rather than judging finishes individually. Primary and secondary materials should clarify volumes, edges, setbacks, and focal areas instead of making the elevation feel visually fragmented.
Review promising options under more than one lighting condition. Daylight reveals surface color and depth, while dusk and night views show whether glazing, shadows, and artificial lighting still support a clear facade composition.
Explore facade styles, materials, and lighting conditions from the same building reference, then develop the direction that best supports your design.